1. SIP VoIP, over 3G and WiFi, with Bluetooth and in the background
I’ve successfully run phone calls over AT&T’s HSPA network, so assuming the processor on the iPad is “all that” this shouldn’t be difficult. If I can get a SIP client that connects to a Bluetooth headset and allows other applications “up front” without killing voice quality then I’ve got a very versatile system for nformation gathering while “on the phone.” This is particularly useful when you see my other requests below:

2. Full-fledged RDP, SSH and VNC clients…and either GoToMyPC or LogMeIn if at all possible
The iPad can be an excellent remote access tool; its screen has enough resolution to run any modern OS without having to scroll around. Add in the keyboard accessory and you’ve got a lovely little remote terminal that works anywhere AT&T has service (I’m talking about the 3G version here). Or any other non-AWS GSM or 3G carrier for that matter; the device is unlocked. SSH would be a godsend for doing command line heavy lifting, though you’d need a host to SSH to in this case (not a big deal for me). Even nicer, all of the above will likely be available for the iPad as App Store apps; no jailbreaking required.

3. A high-quality PDF viewer
I want a PDF viewer that can search and copy text, preferably at least as good as Preview. Yes, Preview can be outdone with PDFs…it’s not the most compatible piece of PDF reader in the world unfortunately.

4. File download capability, preferably with an FTP/SFTP client as well as your standard HTTP access
The iPad has an accessory port, and that accessory port already allows for an SD card reader and a USB port. If you could mount that USB port or SD reader as a drive letter (possible with the OS, but probably will need to be hacked) then there’s a TON of stuff you could do with the iPad, though things start to get kludgy once you realize that you can’t hook up a keyboard and a hard disk/SD card simultaneously. Hmm, maybe the keyboard dock could have a pass-through dock connector…or have an application that would use internal memory as a cache for editing files so you could unplug the drive, edit the files with the keyboard attached, then plug back in and write the files. Heck, wile I’m at it, why not let shares on AFP and SMB be mountable to the device?

5. WiFi printing
This will likely be implemented in short order as an application, though hopefully it will be available throughout the operating system. THat way I can go to a website, grab a PDF of some sort (documentation, textbook, whatever) and send it to a networked printer. No muss, no fuss.

6. Network diagnostics, both standard and wireless (including 3G)
I’m not just talking ping/traceroute/speedtest, though those would be nice. I’m talking about field-test-level stats on wireless and 3G. Why 3G? Well, for one AT&T isn’t the only 3G carrier out there, and if network engineers on smaller carriers can troubleshoot their cellular deployments on a cheap-ish, small device then maybe there will be more field testing going on. On the WiFi side, an iStumbler-esque application would be lovely, complete with a signal strength history graph, with geotagging of signals if at all possible (though this would take a toll on battery life). Heck, add the geolocation to the 3G field test if at all possible and just for kicks port WireShark to the iPad and you’ve got one powerful network analysis device in a pound-and-a-half package.

7. Voice recorder, preferably with backgrounding
I’m guessing this will be included when the iPad ships, but it would be lovely to be able to take the iPad to a lecture or an interview and use it to record the conversation. Even cooler would be an application that would combine a text editor with the voice recorder; in “review” mode you could seek through a recording by going to a place in the text notes, and the other way around.

8. OneNote-like application
Capacitative styli are available. Make an application that allows for text notes, handwriteen notes/diagrams and even voice notes all together. Great for school and for college newspaper writers like myself

9. Access to a bash shell on-device
I’m sure this will only be available when the device is jailbroken, but it would definitely be useful. A full shell, complete with nano for text editing etc., would make the iPad a lightweight BSD workstation, and who doesn’t like lightweight *nix workstations?

Sure, I’m reaching a bit for the above things, but the hardware is all there; you just have to either open up the software or make an application. There are a few subsystems that would be nice to have,a dn they might even be available inthe upcoming iPhone OS 3.2. In all honesty, I think Apple is going to have to make this device rather hackable for enough people to buy it; they’re blazing the trail for a new category of device and if they shun the “Woz box” mentality they’ll be selling very few of these things once the fanboys and their contituents finish buying (which should take about 45 days).

Traceroute to Google:

traceroute to google.com (74.125.159.104), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
1  64.sub-66-174-185.myvzw.com (66.174.185.64)  82.040 ms  71.681 ms  140.969 ms
2  127.sub-66-174-184.myvzw.com (66.174.184.127)  85.990 ms  88.710 ms  93.889 ms
3  146.sub-66-174-44.myvzw.com (66.174.44.146)  94.923 ms  99.735 ms  92.011 ms
4  235.sub-66-174-45.myvzw.com (66.174.45.235)  120.975 ms  88.777 ms  86.127 ms
5  194.sub-66-174-45.myvzw.com (66.174.45.194)  86.937 ms  99.731 ms  92.958 ms
6  98.sub-66-174-44.myvzw.com (66.174.44.98)  89.816 ms  92.702 ms  91.968 ms
7  6.sub-69-83-96.myvzw.com (69.83.96.6)  88.964 ms  90.749 ms  101.982 ms
8  3.sub-69-83-96.myvzw.com (69.83.96.3)  91.973 ms  89.745 ms  92.877 ms
9  253.sub-69-83-97.myvzw.com (69.83.97.253)  86.946 ms  87.701 ms  86.078 ms
10  gigabitethernet3-0-0.gw1.dfw7.alter.net (65.208.8.17)  93.040 ms  86.646 ms  86.916 ms
11  0.ge-2-1-0.xl3.dfw7.alter.net (152.63.103.6)  99.833 ms  102.809 ms  89.928 ms
12  0.ge-6-0-0.br2.dfw13.alter.net (152.63.96.181)  89.939 ms
0.ge-4-0-0.br2.dfw13.alter.net (152.63.96.45)  91.661 ms
0.ge-6-0-0.br2.dfw13.alter.net (152.63.96.181)  89.622 ms
13  te-5-1-0.edge2.dallas3.level3.net (4.68.111.121)  99.987 ms  116.649 ms
te-5-2-0.edge2.dallas3.level3.net (4.68.111.173)  90.885 ms
14  ae-83-80.ebr3.dallas1.level3.net (4.69.145.180)  92.662 ms
ae-73-70.ebr3.dallas1.level3.net (4.69.145.116)  92.622 ms
ae-63-60.ebr3.dallas1.level3.net (4.69.145.52)  97.740 ms
15  ae-7.ebr3.atlanta2.level3.net (4.69.134.22)  115.793 ms  137.608 ms  130.824 ms
16  ae-11-51.car1.atlanta1.level3.net (4.68.103.2)  120.070 ms  117.856 ms  116.900 ms
17  google-inc.car1.atlanta1.level3.net (4.78.209.194)  133.861 ms  118.900 ms  117.002 ms
18  209.85.254.241 (209.85.254.241)  122.982 ms  116.700 ms  119.880 ms
19  209.85.254.2 (209.85.254.2)  113.964 ms  120.700 ms
209.85.254.6 (209.85.254.6)  137.883 ms
20  yi-in-f104.1e100.net (74.125.159.104)  109.804 ms  129.913 ms  131.328 ms

Traceroute to SoftLayer (specifically, the server that hosts this website):

traceroute to echo.mddhosting.com (74.86.48.34), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
1  64.sub-66-174-185.myvzw.com (66.174.185.64)  73.485 ms  72.917 ms  73.973 ms
2  127.sub-66-174-184.myvzw.com (66.174.184.127)  91.918 ms  94.745 ms  184.212 ms
3  146.sub-66-174-44.myvzw.com (66.174.44.146)  100.537 ms  99.876 ms  95.165 ms
4  235.sub-66-174-45.myvzw.com (66.174.45.235)  94.993 ms  100.098 ms  98.174 ms
5  194.sub-66-174-45.myvzw.com (66.174.45.194)  98.010 ms  99.438 ms  93.713 ms
6  98.sub-66-174-44.myvzw.com (66.174.44.98)  94.994 ms  89.077 ms  85.875 ms
7  6.sub-69-83-96.myvzw.com (69.83.96.6)  100.961 ms  105.189 ms  88.124 ms
8  3.sub-69-83-96.myvzw.com (69.83.96.3)  87.943 ms  96.379 ms  97.863 ms
9  253.sub-69-83-97.myvzw.com (69.83.97.253)  98.888 ms  68.155 ms  87.944 ms
10  gigabitethernet3-0-0.gw1.dfw7.alter.net (65.208.8.17)  86.948 ms  69.442 ms  96.147 ms
11  0.ge-2-1-0.xl3.dfw7.alter.net (152.63.103.6)  112.539 ms  89.027 ms  85.911 ms
12  0.so-6-0-0.gw3.dfw13.alter.net (152.63.100.73)  85.015 ms  91.726 ms  86.006 ms
13  internapgige1-gw.customer.alter.net (65.208.15.230)  113.416 ms  96.205 ms  98.848 ms
14  border3.tge3-1-bbnet1.ext1.dal.pnap.net (216.52.191.22)  125.890 ms  95.198 ms  74.901 ms
15  te2-1.cer03.dal01.dallas-datacenter.com (216.52.189.30)  93.058 ms  94.118 ms  95.968 ms
16  po3.dar02.dal01.dallas-datacenter.com (66.228.118.211)  99.913 ms  100.785 ms  107.881 ms
17  po2.fcr02.dal01.dallas-datacenter.com (66.228.118.182)  111.010 ms  92.603 ms  121.966 ms
18  echo.supportedns.com (74.86.48.34)  97.877 ms  96.688 ms  153.805 ms

So pings are a bit lower, on average, than either AT&T or Sprint. They’re also rather predictable, unlike those of CricKet. Then again, I have full EvDO signal sitting at the dining room table with the USB727’s antenna extended. For what it’s worth, this traceroute is pretty close, after the MyVZW hops, to what I see on the family’s brand-spanking-new DSL connection, though that can be expected since both services are from the same company.

Here’s a speedtest…

Well gosh, at least at my location Verizon is nearly as fast as AT&T on the downstream, respectable on the upstream and a good bit more enjoyable to use than AT&T. Heck, the EvDO connection soundly beats the new Verizon DSL, though the DSL connection doesn’t cost $60 per month, nor does it have a ridiculously low data transfer cap.

That said, I’m not the only one on the tower…

Still respectable, just not quite as nice.

Now for a ping test…

Right in line with what I’ve seen on Sprint EvDO, except with a little less latency.

The bottom line: Verizon knows how to run a solid mobile broadband network. So does Sprint. Whether one serves you better than the other depends on who has the big pipes to the towers in your area, and who has the towers in your area period.

Well, and there’s the question of whether you want a 10GB cap for $60 or unlimited service for $70, both via Millenicom of course…unless you really, really want to sign a contract in exchange for a free EvDO modem.

Which provider would I choose at this point, if I had to pick up mobile broadband again? Tough decision; I own an AT&T aircard and don’t want to sign a contract, so the other options have an added expensve for me. With that in mind, I might end up going with AT&T for a month or two, but Sprint if I needed a home replacement connection. If I didn’t need to use the connection as my only internet and didn’t have an AT&T card already, I’d likely choose Verizon, with Sprint as a very close second.

At this point though, for someone new to mobile broadband, there’s one company I wouldn’t recommend anyone to go with, at least for my area: AT&T.

So naturally I pulled out my HTC Touch Pro, which has WiFi, to see what network they were running on. After registering for an account on the hotspot provider (Less Networks, never heard of them) I checked whatismyip.com to see who I was on. Sure enough, the connection there was GVTC, registered as “Guadalupe Valley Telephone”. Right before we pulled out of the place I opened up my laptop, logged into the WiFi network that way and did some tests. Here’s what I got for a traceroute:

traceroute to softlayer.com (66.228.118.53), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
1  192.168.169.1 (192.168.169.1)  194.115 ms  181.762 ms  77.970 ms
2  96-8-192-3.block0.gvtc.com (96.8.192.3)  94.851 ms  107.971 ms  146.974 ms
3  12.88.219.169 (12.88.219.169)  47.516 ms  218.308 ms  149.762 ms
4  cr1.santx.ip.att.net (12.123.154.10)  81.998 ms  58.617 ms  64.528 ms
5  cr2.dlstx.ip.att.net (12.122.30.130)  71.363 ms  55.947 ms  70.918 ms
6  gar6.dlstx.ip.att.net (12.122.100.65)  52.436 ms  58.138 ms  56.583 ms
7  12.90.228.14 (12.90.228.14)  52.971 ms  48.888 ms  80.834 ms
8  border3.tge4-1-bbnet2.ext1.dal.pnap.net (216.52.191.83)  52.188 ms  51.494 ms  52.917 ms
9  te2-1.cer03.dal01.dallas-datacenter.com (216.52.189.30)  55.883 ms  54.237 ms  55.133 ms
10  po3.dar01.dal01.dallas-datacenter.com (66.228.118.209)  53.084 ms  84.979 ms  47.910 ms
11  po1.slr01.dal01.dallas-datacenter.com (66.228.118.138)  66.371 ms  54.266 ms  57.160 ms

I have a feeling that the WiFi conection was flakey, otherwise I would have gotten a better traceroute.

Speed-test-wise I got the following:

I’m guessing the line was provisioned at 8 Mbps down and 1 Mbps up, but I can’t be sure.

The IP address, for what it’s worth, was 96.8.236.103.

All in all, not a bad hotspot, and the traceroute is nice and short between where I was and AT&T’s network in San Antonio, which GVTC appears to use exclusively to connect to the internet nowadays. So someone using an AT&T aircard and GVTC FTTH will find themselves with similar traceroutes within just a few hops, at least around here.

I guess I’ll leave it at that…if I talk any more about GVTC I’ll start getting envious of their 20/3 and 40/10 FTTH service, which I have no chance of getting at my place. Can’t even get DSL there :/

One problem arose when I got home: my aircard kept switching to EDGE during the middle of a data session. Not a good thing for a $60 + taxes and fees data plan. So I needed to force 3G on the card. The problem there was that only the Windows Sierra and AT&T clients allow forced 3G. So (not knowing that settings are stored on the modem and thus once I set 3G-only on my Windows computer it would be 3G-only on my Mac) I scrounged around and found this page. I followed those instructions and was able to make sure my aircard was 3G-only.

If you don’t want to read through a (relatively short) page on how to kick your aircard into high gear, you’re in luck. Here’s what you’d do on a Mac to force-3G a Sierra aircard. Note that this procedure was performed on OS X 10.6.1 and with the Apple “native” driver installed (a tiny download from here). This is also with the latest modem firmware, which I had to use the Sierra driver (vs. the native one) to upgrade to.

1. Go to Terminal (Applications > Utilities)
2. Type in screen /dev/tty.wwanCMD 115200 and hit enter.
3. Type in AT!band? and hit enter.
4. If you see the number 02, you’re already locked into 3G-only mode. Otherwise, type in AT!band=02 and hit enter to set the mode. If you wanted to go 2G-only, the code would be 04 instead of 02. AUtoselect is 00.

Hope this helps! Now I’m cooking along with 2-3 bars of signal (-87 dBm right now) and pulling down these speeds:

Though connection quality is quite a bit more variable than Sprint’s (slower, particularly on uploads) connection at my place…

In comparison, SPrint usually pulls down 1.3 Mbps down, 300-500 kbps up and gets a B on connection quality.

A couple of weeks ago Guaranty Bank failed. It wasn’t the only bank failure on that Friday (the 21st of August), but it was the largest. Guaranty’s demise was the second largest bank failure of the year, next to Colonial Bank in Alabama.

What’s surprising to me is that, so far, absolutely nothing has changed for me, two weeks into the switchover to ownership by the Spanish BBVA group. My debit card still works, complete with ATM fee rebates. I’m pretty sure I can still write checks, provided I have money in my account (I pretty much won’t after my monthly credit card payment goes through, thanks to a rather large cash-out a few days ago at a Wal-Mart ATM). Online banking still works with my old username, password and security questions. Heck, I might even keep my (rather awesome) grandfathered free checking plan: a paltry amount of interest on top of no-fee ATM withdrawals, 5¢ rebate on debit-as-credit transactions, plus a bunch of free checks.

On the other hand, I’ll trust the (significantly) more conservative Broadway Bank with any big money that I might earn. When you’ve got $2 billion in assets in a small, hyper-regional bank, you’re a pretty solid entity. When you neither offer awesome free-checking features nor buy into subprime lending, you’re bound to stick around. To my knowledge Broadway is the only bank local to me to get a sterling five-star BankRate rating; even BBVA is three stars (Guaranty was two when I moved my money out).

Sure, I’ll keep a few hundred dollars in Guar…er…BBVA for the free ATM withdrawals and such, but I’m trusting my main money from here on out to a local entity who doesn”t loan out their money willy-nilly, even though my newly preferred bank has downright crappy account features, uses my SSN as my online banking username and technically hasn’t kept my dollars and cents intact better than the FDIC did with Guaranty.

The super deal this time: Windows Live…er…Bing Cash Back. It’s how I got my Vizio VS42LF TV for about $490 (after $198 in cash back, a 10% PayPal discount and a few bucks in credit card rewards) and it’s how you can nab magnetic storage for under 5¢ per GB. In order to get this discount, just go here (a Bing search for “newegg”) and click the link next to the Bing Cashback icon.

Now you’re locked into a session that will give you 10% cashback (via Bing; you’ll have to get a Bing cashback account there but it’s not a huge deal) on pretty much whatever you buy on Newegg. You can now mosey on over here and grab up to five drives at the net price (once the limit-five-per-household rebate and the up-to-sixty-days Bing cash back are in) of just $57.49 apiece, or roughly 5.75¢ per GB. Solid.

Just remember to claim your cash back, to mail in your rebate(s) before the end of September and to grab the drives either by the end of this month or before they sell out again, whichever comes first!

1. My mom saw a Verizon truck in the county fair parade today (I didn’t go; saw no need and was tired). The truck has “High Speed Internet coming soon!” or similar painted on te side. This is DSL, not FiOS (Verizon always refers to their fiber offering by its trademarked name). However from what I hear Verizon’s DSL release is just a ploy to drive up the sale cost of their system here; Fredericksburg isn’t a large metropolitan area, and there are too mayn bridged taps and other phone system anomaies here for DSL to reach beyond a small part of town. At least that’s what the scuttlebutt says. My prediction: Verizon offers some flavor of DSL to folks who can currently get Windstream DSL, then sells the system to whoever will take it, using the “we have DSL in our central office” argument to jack the price up slightly above what the system is worth.
2. Bee Creek Communications, the local our-hands-are-tied-and-if-anyone-competes-with-us-we-lose wireless ISP, was in the parade today as well. They also have a third-of-a-page ad in the paper advertising free installation to new customers until September 15th. A few years ago an installation with similar equipment would have run you around $220. The problem here is that their network is already over capacity in some areas, they’re spread too thinly in terms of manpower and their speeds are the stuff of yesteryear, barely competitive with satellite internet (though their monthly transfer caps are higher). The service also requires a two-year contract with a $125 early termination fee. If you want a one-year agreement service will run you another $10 per month. In short, don’t buy.
3. Clearwire is launching WiMAX service in San Antonio and Austin on September 1st. Maybe they’ll bring their service here. Would put Bee Creek right out of business, since Clear has an uncapped-download, one-megabit-upload (or is that uncapped too?) tier for a mere $45 per month. They even have cheaper tiers to compete with your garden-variety DSL options. They even have business tiers that will fill the gap between Bee Creek’s woefully slow packages and Time Warner Cable’s woefully expensive ones. In a nutshell, something for everyone as long as you’re within range of one of their towers. I’ll be keeping close track of what happens here. For what it’s worth, I told Bee Creek about Clear’s possible imminent launch nearby, and I wouldn’t be surprised if their larger-than-usual print ad was a direct result of this.
4. Hill Country Telephone Cooperative has run fiber around the city of Fredericksburg and plans to get CLEC (competitive local exchange carrier) operations started before the end of the year, or something close to that anyway. They may just focus on high-end business operations (like they’re doing in nearby Kerrville, where they recently connected the city’s independent school district) however they’re a residential provider in their home area, so they know how to deal with “normal” customers. Plus, they have a lot of options for deploying service; in addition to their new fiber-optic network they have an AWS (1700 MHz cellular) license for this area, a 3.65 GHz “light license” which they’re using for WiMAX service in the nearby town of Mason, and maybe (if the price is right) Verizon’s old copper network, though I’m not sure why they’d want it. I heard HCTC offered $50 million for the network a few years back, and Verizon wanted $80 million fot it. Knowing that the network wasn’t worth that much, HCTC walked.

In short, it will be interesting to see what happens around here in the relatively near future with regard to internet service. Right now Time Warner Cable is the only provider who will give you more than a 2 Mbps connection (okay, HughesNet will give you 5 Mbps but they don’t count due to obscenely low caps and ridiculously high monthly fees). They’re also the only provider around here with customer-available fiber; Verizon apparently doesn’t have any. Sounds like that may change soon though. I’ll tell all I know (or am allowed to tell, whichever is less) as I find out more.

So the big question in my mind is, how would I design the perfect set top box, from both a consumer and a provider point of view? Here are some specs I came up with:

1. nVidia ION chipset. Everyone says the thing can decode 1080p video with no problem. Paired with a decent operating system and a halfway-decent processor (like the low-power Atom 330) you’ve got an STB that not only performs well, but also can be used for a variety of things and isn’t going to run up the power bill.
2. CableCard support, multiple streams. Granted, this is a given these days, but why not make things clear? RF video (via GPON) is what I’m assuming as the last mile medium; IPTV would work a bit differently of course.
3. Easy-access 12.5mm height 2.5″ hard disk bay to turn pa plain set top box into a DVR. Pop in a bare SATA drive and pay a one-time upgrade fee, then start recording shows. Or pay a slightly larger fee plus the price of a handpicked drive and a tech will do all of that for you. Bottom line: there should be no hardware difference between a regular set top box and an HD one, aside from the presence of a hard drive, or lack thereof. If you’re wondering why a 2.5″ drive, it’s because the drive is smaller and takes less power. If people want to store gobs of content they can add an external drive. There might come a time when all video content is cached at the edge of the network (networked DVRs) but until then, let people have as many bits in their box as they possibly can install.
4. Flash storage for non-video, namely the operating system and program guide. You want that stuff to load quickly, so why commit it to spinning metal when you can get enough flash to hold it for under $20?
5. HD on every STB so you can say that there’s no extra equipment required. Plus, having a single model of box makes things a whole lot easier to keep track of.
6. 2 USB ports. Aside from easy testing of devices, this would allow people to view media on their STB by plugging in a memory card reader or something equally quirky-but-cool. More importantly, people would be able to connect a whopping 2TB drive to their STB if they wanted and record shows onto it. The more shows they have recorded, the longer they’ll stick around to watch ‘em, and the longer they’ll pay for service. Also, you can hook…
7. …an external Blu-ray player to one of those USB ports. Make one that fits in with the decor of the typical media center and you’ve got yet another feature that makes that STB “sticky”. Why not? The onboard processor can handle it.
8. Whole-home functionality. No need having multiple DVRs recording the same thing when you can just pull between them. That way one DVR does all the work and the rest sit there with less stuff to break.
9. TiVo as the operating system, with no TiVo monthly fees. If you’re a service provider, you can probably work with TiVo on lowering the “price for life” subscription per box. Also, why use any other piece of software than the best? People say “I TiVoed that” just like they say “I googled that” so why not take advantage of the latent mindshare?
10. Farm out on-demand as much as possible, with an “you’re on our awesome box” commission of a few percent. Nobody wants to spend $8 on a cable-provided movie on demand. Though on the other hand some sports stuff has to be done that way, at which point just download the on-demand stuff over the internet rather than via RF.

The above list might make for an expensive” dumb” set top box, but then again it might now. I’m pretty sure that, when purchased in bulk, all the above components would total less than $200, so if you charge $8 per month per box with the first one free you’re making your money back before the boxes are obsolete. Plus the fact that you’re using a single box across your network will make things a lot easier to deal with for customer service. I’m pretty sure any provider who instituted all of the above would have people running from competitors, even if the service did cost a few bucks more per month. Then again, I’ve never had pay-TV in my life :p

1. Pocket can now “flash” phones at all of their locations, as long as their software is working correctly. The price: free. The upside: you can take your old name-your-CDMA-carrier phone and plunk it down on Pocket’s network without having to shell out for one of the company’s own phone models. The downside: you may not get data access on a non-Pocket phone, depending on the model.
2. Pocket’s roaming option, available for 19¢ per minute or $5 per month for 50 minutes, mainly picks Verizon as the out-of-area provider. This hapens whenever the Pocket phone can’t pick up a “native” signal, not just if you’re out of Pocket’s licensed service area. This is a good thing in areas where Pocket doesn’t have towers, but at that point you’re limited by how good your phone is at receiving signals.
3. The UTStarCom 7025, even with its pull-up antenna, was bested by my parents’ Nokia 2126i internal-antenna Tracfones in the reception department. So if you want a Pocket phone with good reception for $39, consider your options narrowed.
4. Pocket will be expanding to the western side of the Colorado Rockies (to the Grand Juntion area, to be exact) shortly. They appear to be leasing spectrum from ClearTalk PCS, another unlimited-minutes CDMA provider, and they don’t face competition from anyone else in the area as far as cheap unlimited providers go. Rumor has it that Grand Junction will be 3G-enabled, in contrast to the highly competitive-albeit-2.5G Texas market. Guess when you’re priced $5 per month lower than in other markets due to competition there isn’t a whole lot of dough left over to roll out 3G for the handful of customers who will actually care about the tech at this point.
5. GJ and Texas are 1900MHz markets for Pocket, allowing them to use a plethora of phones, some of them cheap. These markets also allow Pocket to flash phones from other carriers without worrying about whether those carriers support Pocket’s network. In contrast, Pocket’s New England market (also rumored by Teas staff to be 3G) is in the AWS 1700 band, as are the newer network expansions of CricKet and MetroPCS.
6. Pocket handles voicemail in an interesting way (for a cell phone provider) on their $25 plan: they don’t have it. Remember when your landline phone would ring “forever” without an answering machine on the other end? Seems like Pocket is the same way, which makes it a great fit for Google Voice forwarding or the like. Then again, if your phone’s off, callers will hear a message like the following: “Pocket Communications. Your call cannot be completed as dialed. Please try again later.“
7. Pocket now has some nice phones on their network, thanks to their rather large-for-a-regional size (over 300,000 customers) and use of standard frequency bands in the Texas area. While they do have a number of AWS-equipped handsets in their lineup (including multiple models from ZTE and Kyocera, plus a Huawei phone or two) their upper echelon is star-studded with the likes of Motorola’s VE20, a phone that sells on Pocket for a mere $100 more than on Sprint…with a two-year contract! On the other hand, the newer mid-range Pocket phones all have AWS radios , and include such standard fare as the Motorola VE240 and the Nokia 1006 (both of which are lovely entry-level phones by the way).
8. If you want stellar rural coverage, look elsewhere. Pocket doesn’t have that quite down. Then again, that’s not their business model, and their coverage map doesn’t set up any false expectations. Wherever they say they cover, they cover. No dropped calls due to overloaded networks, no “it should work here but doesn’t” areas, no roaming where home coverage is advertised. Then again, get a phone with good reception so you’ll get better-than-advertised coverage; chances are that, if you’re traveling around the hill country, you’ll need it. Less so in markets that are easier RF-wise.
9. Pocket’s customer service is just fine. I’d say excellent, but the guy I talked to on the phone didn’t know off the top of his head that shortcode-based SMS still doesn’t work on the carrier (a blessing and a curse…no stupid ringtone deals either). The IVR tree is exactly one level deep: press one for English, 2 para Español. You’re connected with a live rep mere seconds later. Now that’s service.

The bottom line: I like rooting for the home team by default, especially when they haev a great product. Pocket is “gettin’ there” even in an area that’s hard to cover in terms of cell towers, with prices lower than a landline for a similar feature set. Plus, you can get phone numbers with the 777 prefix. Now how cool is that?

UPDATE: Newegg (prematurely as far as I can see, I might add) ended the coupon promo, and the Hitachi drives are now all sold out. Nice run though. Still, Newegg has some cheap drives, like this Seagate 1.5TB $109.99 beaut’. Just remember that life’s a little slower when you want more bits for the buck, that drive runs at a mere 5900 RPMs.

Want some cheap internal storage? Don’t mind using Hitachi for said storage? Then check out the below:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822145233

But wait, it gets better. In addition to the $10 mail-in rebate, you can get another 10% off with the coupon code hddsale15.

The result: a full terabyte of storage for a mere $54.99 shipped after rebate. That’s a teeny 5.5¢ per GB.

Just keep in mind that the window of opportunity for the rebate and the promo code ends at midnight on Monday the 17th. After which things are back up to normal with 1TB drives bottoming out at about $75.